logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.07.15 2014고단7212
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 2014, the Defendant, on the fourth floor of the building located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, installed three shower facilities and six studios installed in a bend, employing two female employees, and posted advertisements such as "faf," "19.com," "60,000 1.60,000 140,000 1,0000 1,000 60,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000,000 won and 120,000,000 won and 2,000,000 won and 1,000,000 won and 30,000 won and 2,000,000 won and 30,000 won and 2,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements by the defendant in court ( those on the fifth trial date);

1. An interrogation protocol of the police against the accused or F;

1. Investigation report (No. 13 No.);

1. Seizure records;

1. A monthly commercial rent contract;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense (Article 30 of the Criminal Act is added to crimes committed on July 22, 2014) and selection of imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The first sentence of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under the latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [the scope of recommending punishment] of the second category of sexual traffic crimes subject to the age of 19 or older, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic [the decision of sentence] of the basic area (6 to January 4] (the decision of sentence] of the defendant who led to the crime at the time of crackdown, reversed his statement in this court, and the prosecution submitted the result of the mobile analysis on the mobile phones of the defendant, thereby allowing him to commit his crime.

arrow