1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is 1) Defendant Namyang Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Namyang”)

(2) The Plaintiff entered into an agency contract with the Defendant, and entered into an agency contract with the Defendant, while operating the agency from April 200 to May 201, and supplied products to the general retail stores located in Incheon, Incheon, on the Plaintiff’s account, and supplied goods to the Plaintiff’s account and the consignment transaction supplied to the Plaintiff’s general retail stores located in the same area.

B. The Fair Trade Commission decided October 14, 2013, and related decision 1) decided D on December 6, 2006, acknowledged that Defendant Namyang Industries supplied E agency with products in excess of the ordered quantity and amount, and issued a corrective order to Defendant Namyang Industries (“(i) shall not re-be forced to purchase the products, and (ii) shall notify the Defendant’s agency of the receipt of the corrective order within 30 days of the receipt of the corrective order. (ii) The Fair Trade Commission decided F on October 14, 2013; (iii) Defendant Namyang Industries forced its agency to purchase 26 products, such as Buddhist leases, from around October 207 to May 2013; (iv) Defendant Nam Yangyang Industries: (v) admitting that it forced its agency to purchase the products from July 2005 to April 206; and (v) 10% of the total amount of wages from 2008 to 30% of its distribution order without agreement on July 25, 2015.

3 The Seoul High Court order the payment of the penalty surcharge as the Seoul High Court No. 2014Nu1910.