1. The Defendant: 138,879,655 won to Plaintiff B; 12,572,095 won to Plaintiff C; 104,435,037 won to Plaintiff D; and 62.

1. Basic facts

가. 당사자의 지위 1) 피고는 시유, 발효유, 분유, 치즈 등 유제품과 음료 등을 제조, 판매하는 회사로서, 아래 그림과 같이 전국 1,800여개의 대리점을 통하여 대형 유통점 또는 일반 소매점에 제품을 공급하거나 편의점을 통하여 소비자에게 제품을 공급하고 있다. 피고의 제품 유통 경로 공장 (5개) ⇒ 공장 물류팀 또는 물류센터 ⇒ 대리점 (1800여개) ⇒ ⇒ 대형 유통점 방문판매원 ⇒ ⇒ 소비자 일반 소매점 ⇒ 편의점 ⇒ 2) 원고들은 피고와 대리점 계약을 체결하고, 아래 표 기재와 같이 각 대리점을 운영하면서 피고로부터 제품을 공급받아 판매하였다.

The Plaintiff’s agency operation period from July 2, 2004 to August 2, 2009: B 2004 to February 3, 2012; from November 4, 2011 to December 5, 2004 to December 5, 2011; from October 6, 2004 to October 6, 201 to April 1, 201 to April 1, 2006 to August 201, 201 to August 1, 201 to 30, 201 to April 7, 2013, 200 to August 1, 201 to 30, 201 to 10 to 10, 2010 to 10,50 from August 1, 201 to 3, 201 to 10 to 10, 2010 to 10 to 18, 2010.

As of October 14, 2013, the Fair Trade Commission issued a corrective order and penalty surcharge of KRW 12,464,00,000 to the agency without prior agreement by the display promotion personnel dispatched from October 14, 2013 to May 5, 2013, and the Fair Trade Commission issued a corrective order and penalty surcharge of KRW 12,464,00,00 to the agency (the Defendant received a corrective order from the Fair Trade Commission on December 6, 2006) by recognizing that the Defendant forced the agency to purchase 26 items, including the rental, from October 207 to May 5, 2013.

(2) The Defendant filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the foregoing penalty surcharge payment order with Seoul High Court 2014Nu1910, and the said court enforced purchase on January 30, 2015 for the total quantity of items purchased on January 26, 2015.