logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.10.12 2016고단1317
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in DM520.

On April 16, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol with 0.220% of alcohol concentration in blood on April 22, 2016, and led the Defendant to drive the said car with one lane in front of the F pharmacy in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, into the erode of the erode of Chungcheong apartment.

The location is a private-distance intersection with no signal, etc., and the HV car driven by the victim G (V, 29 years old) who was on the math, had the left turn, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle first sent the vehicle to the left and confirmed the safety of the course, and then proceeded with the front part of the driver's vehicle in front of the driver's vehicle under the influence of alcohol, due to the negligence of the driver's duty of care to check the safety of the course of the vehicle. However, the part of the victim I (V, 60 years old) who was trying to start the operation of the passenger with the front part of the driver's vehicle under the influence of alcohol and the left part of the driver's vehicle. The part of the victim I (V, 60 years old) who was trying to start the operation of the passenger by being pushed up with the front part of the driver's vehicle.

On the same day, the Defendant continued to proceed in the process after the above accident. At around 22:08 on the same day, at around 22:08, the two-lanes in front of the K Building in Daejeon, along one-lane from the cultural development intersection. At that time, a crosswalk is installed in the front section, and despite the vehicle signal was red, the Defendant was negligent in proceeding without stopping under the influence of alcohol and in the course in contravention of the signal, and caused the Defendant to go beyond the road by facing the front part of the Defendant’s driver’s car, which was sufficient from the right side of the road to the left side of the crosswalk in accordance with the crosswalk signals.

As a result, the defendant is unable to drive a car normally due to the influence of drinking.

arrow