logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.01.18 2016가단7778
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 7,000,000 for Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 3,000,000 for Plaintiff B; and (c) for each of them, from July 10, 2015 to January 10, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are legally married couple, and the Plaintiff B is engaged in the meat distribution business in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and the Defendant is also engaged in the meat distribution business in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and is well known to and inside with the Plaintiffs.

나. 피고는 2015. 7. 10. 17:53경부터 18:01경까지 원고 A가 운영하는 서울 성동구 D 소재 “E” 식당에서 원고들을 포함한 일행들과 술을 마시던 중 갑자기 피고의 옆에 앉아 있는 원고 A의 손을 잡아 쓰다듬은 뒤 원고 A의 손에 피고의 입술을 가져다 대고 원고 A의 손을 피고의 뺨에 비볐으며, 계속해서 원고 A의 어깨와 머리를 감싸 안고 원고 A의 귀에 피고의 입술을 가져다 댔다.

C. After that, the plaintiff B, who became aware of these circumstances, resisted to the defendant, the defendant 18:43 on the same day from around 18:50 on the same day, and the defendant re-entered into the above restaurant and moved to the front of the kitchen and brought the front of the kitchen. The plaintiff B, who became aware of the above circumstances, got uneasy for customers by avoiding the disturbance, and preventing the customers who find the above restaurant from driving away, and did not comply with the request.

In addition, even after the Defendant moved the Defendant out of the above restaurant, the Defendant saw the time to the customers who want to sit and enter the above restaurant by standing in the stairs leading the Defendant to the above restaurant, and continue to stay in the vicinity of the above restaurant even after the day 21:35, the Defendant entered the above restaurant again at around 21:35 on the same day, and returned to the inside of the restaurant, such as the kitchen.

As above, the defendant forcibly commits an indecent act against the plaintiff A, and leaves the restaurant operated by the plaintiff A.

On February 5, 2016, Seoul Eastern District Court 2015No3492, on the act of refusing to receive the Gu and obstructing Plaintiff A’s restaurant business by force, is recognized to have committed indecent act, interference with business, and refusal to leave.

arrow