Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

The defendants are married couple.

1. On August 28, 2016, at around 18:09, Defendant A, at the emergency room located in Jongno-gu Seoul University, Jongno-gu Seoul University (Seoul University Hospital), requested treatment under the influence of alcohol, followed by a large sound, and was dispatched to the site after receiving a report 112, Defendant A expressed his/her desire to return home from E of the Seoul beneficiary Police Station D box affiliated with E of the Seoul beneficiary Police Station Diplomatic Police Station, and the above police officer, “this sprinke must be his/her superior, and this sprink” to the above police officer, and the Defendant laid down E’s spack on his/her hand by asking the part of the back part of the F’s left part of the back part of the F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reported cases.

2. The Defendants’ co-principal committed an act of disturbance, such as, at the time, at the time, place, and place described in paragraph (1), breathing, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendants expressed a large amount of voice over a hour, and interfered with the duties of the above hospital by obstructing the security service of the security personnel in his name, as well as other patient treatment of his own doctors, including G who are the security personnel of the above hospital.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each police protocol to G, E, and F

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provision on criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties), Articles 314(1) and 30 (the point of obstructing performance of duties) of the Criminal Act; Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A with an ordinary concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (Mutual Crimes of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties);

1. Defendants who choose punishment: Each selective fine

1. Defendant A among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A, with the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, was drunk and was reported in the emergency room of the hospital, thereby obstructing the hospital work for emergency patients by avoiding disturbance.