Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall interfere with the rescue, transfer, emergency treatment or medical treatment of an emergency patient by persons engaged in emergency medical services by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, force or other means.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, at around 04:30 on August 26, 2016, the victim F, who was a doctor in an emergency medical service at the E hospital emergency room located in Ma, 2016, was taking emergency measures for a sudden patient due to a fall accident, was the victim F, who was a doctor in an emergency medical service.

Defendant B, on the ground that it would be better to view the case to another hospital that can be treated with Native surgery, had been avoided tobacco for about eight minutes, including: (a) Defendant B, who had been aware of the existence of these weather gue, emergency patients; (b) was responsible at all night workers at all times; and (c) ra gue, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, and Defendant A had expressed a large voice to “C, E, E,” and h, who had expressed a large voice to “C, E, E,” respectively.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the emergency treatment of the emergency patients by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A report on occurrence (violation of the Emergency Medical Service Act);

1. Application of the CDA-1 statute

1. Article 60(1)1 and Article 12 of the Emergency Medical Service Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for criminal facts

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, each of the Defendants’ detention in a workhouse

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include four criminal records of violence committed against Defendant B on the grounds of the sentencing of each of the Defendants’ provisional payment orders (hereinafter “instant criminal procedure”). Defendant A had only one criminal records of violence, emergency treatment and treatment of other emergency patients in the emergency room in the hospital as determined by the Defendants’ crime were obstructed, and the victim wanted to punish the Defendants.