logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2021.02.08 2020고정451
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On January 24, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Seoul Central District Court on January 24, 201 and the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 31, 20

[2] The Defendant, who is an employee of the Construction Business Chain Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”), committed an act as if the Defendant was delegated by B with the authority to conclude a contract for the removal of buildings and the disposal of construction wastes, and instead, had the Defendant executed the relevant construction contract with D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) and carried out the construction work individually.

On May 25, 2018, the Defendant entered into a contract for the removal of buildings and construction waste disposal works in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant contract”) ordered by D at the site office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E and 1 (hereinafter “instant contract”). Around May 25, 2018, the Defendant made D representative G (hereinafter “G”) that the Defendant believed to have been entrusted with the authority to conclude the instant contract, enter the part of “H”, “H”, “H” and “B”, which are the business registration number of B, in the business registration number column of the above contract, and written name “B”, “B” and “B”, “B” and “B” in the name of the company.

B The name of the corporation was stamped, and the name of the defendant was affixed on the side of the statement "on-site agent A", and the contract of this case was drawn to G in the same place.

As a result, the defendant is entitled to exercise one chapter of the instant contract in the name of the private document B, which is a private document.

arrow