logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.01.23 2017가단225014
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally committed against Plaintiff A with respect to KRW 5,580,860, and KRW 500,000 for each of the said money and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. At around 02:40 on September 20, 2016, the Defendants: (a) smoked tobacco on the street in front of the main point of “H” located in Incheon Strengthening Group G; (b) the Plaintiff, out of the said main point, told the Defendants “A,” and had been in dispute with the Defendants on the ground that “A was said to have been frightd by a student’s tobacco,” and (c) he was frighted with the Plaintiff; (d) Defendant D was frighting the Plaintiff’s bridge part of the Plaintiff’s bridge; (e) took part in the Plaintiff’s face and body part of the Plaintiff’s face; (e) took part in the Plaintiff’s face and body part of the Plaintiff’s face; and (e) Defendant F took part in the Plaintiff’s face with the Plaintiff’s face, and caused the Plaintiff’s injury, such as high-quality injury on the left side of the Plaintiff’s bridge for treatment for about four weeks.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

Plaintiff

B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the occurrence of the liability for damages and the recognition of the limitation, the Defendants jointly and severally are liable for damages sustained by Plaintiff A pursuant to Article 760 of the Civil Act, since they sustained injury, such as external wounds on the left-hand side, etc., due to the instant accident.

However, in light of the background of the instant accident, the degree of injury, and all other circumstances recognized in the records and pleadings, it is reasonable to limit the Defendants’ liability for damages to 80% from the perspective of fair burden of damage.

3. Scope of liability for damages

A. The Plaintiff seeking payment of KRW 607,530,00 from the daily income during the period of hospitalization for the purpose of malutistic surgery.

However, it is recognized that the Plaintiff was hospitalized from December 7, 2016 to December 9, 2016 in order to treat the left-hand scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics.

arrow