beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.
However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A’s joint crime committed by the Defendants is a person who was engaged in the vessel operation processing business under a subcontract with the number of 30 full-time workers from the Do-site with the trade name of “E” in Tong Young-si. Defendant B is a steering car of Defendant A, who worked as the head of the contact with the head of the contact in the above E.
Defendant
A is not appropriated for all wages to workers and taxes that should be paid, etc. on the wind that the unit price of the gold amount received from around April 2016 from around the Republic of Korea is reduced, and as a result, A continues to apply for a substitute payment in a manner that makes the amount of the delayed payment to workers less than the actual amount of the delayed payment. On August 15, 2016, at the above E office, A is expected to apply for a substitute payment to Defendant B as if the amount of the delayed payment is greater than the actual delayed payment.
When a substitute payment is made, it refers to the payment of unpaid wages and the remaining amount will be used for the company fund, and Defendant B also accepted it.
Accordingly, Defendant A received all the flag payments from Defendant B on June 2016 and July 1, 2016, and agreed that only the amount of 80% benefits between Defendant B and Defendant B shall be paid on August 1, 2016, and even though the wages in arrears against Defendant B were in arrears of KRW 2,565,00,000, Defendant B prepared a false statement of the delayed payment amount as if the wages in arrears were in arrears of KRW 2,565,00, and Defendant B sent it to Defendant B. On October 24, 2016, Defendant B submitted an application for recognition of the fact of bankruptcy, etc. to the branch office of the Busan Labor Agency through the Busan Labor Agency, and submitted the aforementioned false statement of money in arrears.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to receive a substitute payment from Defendant B, and submitted false documents which were written by the outside officer as if the amount of delay was 2,565,000, even though the amount of delay to Defendant B was 1,700,000 won.
2. Defendant A’sless teacher and Defendant B.