logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.06.18 2019고단656
특수협박등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:00 on October 20, 2018, the Defendant made a suspicion of the appearance of the victim D (L, 36 years of age) who is the Defendant’s residence in the Daejeon Seodong B apartment C, and threatened the victim with the intent of “I am going to go to go to the Defendant,” and the victim expressed that “I am to go to the Defendant,” and the victim’s defect that was not said, “I am to go to the Defendant, I am to the same age as C, I am, I am to the C, I am, I am to do so, I am to the death of the Defendant, I am to the death of the Defendant.”

2. At around 01:47 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault against the police officer G, who was arrested as a flagrant offender by G, etc., who was a police officer belonging to the 112-reported police station F district unit of the Daejeon Sungsung Police Station, and was transferred to the said district due to the same act as the preceding paragraph, and without any justifiable reason, who was arrested as a flagrant offender by G, etc., who was a police officer belonging to the 112-reported police officer’s 112-reported case handling and investigation; and (b) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and D;

1. Application of excessive blade statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 284, 283 (1), and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the obstruction of performance of official duties, and fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act is to recognize and reflect the error of the defendant.

The spouse of a defendant shall not want the punishment of the defendant.

There is no criminal defendant who has been punished for violence tendency crime.

It is the most important thing to raise multi-child.

The defendant seems to have never exercised domestic violence before.

An excessive drinking or weekend life will take place.

arrow