Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for one year, for Defendant B.
, however, the defendant from the date of this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. A. Around 00:50 on November 6, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (year 36) with a alcohol disease, which is a dangerous and dangerous object, on the ground that the victim E (year 36) was drinking alcohol at a “D” restaurant located in Daejeon Pungdong-gu C, and was seated on the rear table, and was frightencing.
In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.
B. The criminal facts that interfere with business were appropriately revised to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's right of defense.
At the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (a), the Defendant: (a) obstructed customers of the “D” restaurant operated by the Victim F (34 years of age) as above; (b) obstructed the disturbance between about 10 minutes, such as assaulting them on the floor; and (c) tearing them.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.
C. The Defendant injured the victim’s injury resulting from special obstruction of performance of official duties stated in the date, time, and place mentioned in the above paragraph (a) stating that “The Defendant Ha (the age of 26) who was a policeman belonging to the Daejeon Pungdong Police Station G, who was called upon 112 reporting that “the Defendant franks another person, frighting him,” asked the Defendant to ask the Defendant’s personal information, and “Is the Defendant to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright the victim’s left part of the cell phone.
Accordingly, the defendant carries dangerous articles and interferes with the legitimate execution of duties of the victim, who is a police officer, concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.