1. The Defendant’s chronic rupture, the side rupture of the side rupture, and the right side of the Plaintiff on September 30, 2014.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 5, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Army, and served as the 133-K-21 Operational Water Station for the 133-K-21 Operational Water, and was discharged from military service on May 27, 2013.

B. On July 31, 2012, around 09:00, the Plaintiff asserted that, as part of the preparatory process for national defense training from the 133-mechanic 2 heavy equipment, the Defendant applied for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State to the Defendant on March 19, 2014, he/she applied for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State to the Defendant on the ground that he/she suffered from the chronic rupture (hereinafter referred to as “first rupture”) of the chronic rupture (hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”), the side side side of the right side of the instant accident under the supervision of the right (hereinafter referred to as “the second rupture”) and face (hereinafter referred to as “the third rupture”).

C. On September 30, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision on non-conformity of the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the following grounds.

In the case of a first instance objection, the records of medical treatment, etc. of the plaintiff are proved to have been proved to have been proved to have been shown before the accident of this case.

In the case of a second injury, it is a disease caused in the course of treating the first injury under the name of disease confirmed as a result of the first injury test conducted after the first injury surgery.

In the case of a third party objection, there is no objective data that can confirm the occurrence in connection with the performance of official duties other than the plaintiff's statement.

Therefore, it is difficult to recognize the wounds of this case as wounded in the performance of duties or education and training directly related to national defense security, etc., and they suffered the wounds of this case among duties or education and training not directly related to national defense security, etc.

It is difficult to recognize that the proximate causal relation with the performance of official duties is created or aggravated.

[Ground of Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 3, and Eul