logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.10.12 2017고단1761
부동산실권리자명의등기에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, for six months, for six months, and for six months, for six months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Defendant B is the representative director of the Fund in charge of the settlement of disputes, Defendant B is the guilty portion (each of the defendants' compulsory execution) and Defendant A is a partner of the Fund in charge of the settlement of disputes, who has worked in the Fund in charge of the settlement of disputes, and Defendant C has worked in the Fund in charge of the settlement of disputes for about 10 years.

The Defendants did not pay 286 million won for the new construction of the “I” studio building on the 5th fiveth floor above the H’s land at the time of so-called “I” to the victim G, and the victim did not pay 286 million won. On October 16, 2014, the Daegu District Court 2014 filed a lawsuit against Defendant A for the claim for construction payment under 8121 (the Ulsan District Court 2015, the same 706th day after this transmission), and received a duplicate of the complaint around November 14, 2014.

around June 16, 2015, the Defendants prepared a false contract to sell H land in the name of the Defendant C to the Defendant for KRW 400 million, without paying any purchase-price and acquisition tax at the Nam-gu J and K Certified Judicial Scriveners Office of Ulsan-gu, Seoul, and 303, and completed the registration of transfer of ownership based on the above transaction agreement around June 16, 2015, on the same day, the Defendants applied for the registration of transfer of ownership based on the sale of the above land to the Changwon District Court (the Ulsan District Court registry in the factory office is apparent to be a clerical error) and on the same day, Defendant C completed the registration of transfer of ownership.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit a false transfer of property to the obligee for the purpose of avoiding compulsory execution.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Partial statement of witness G;

1. Some of the statements made by the Defendants and L in the interrogation protocol for the prosecution (excluding the part concerning theM telephone statement)

1. Some statements concerning the defendants or L during the interrogation of suspect in the police room

1. Each investigation report (the civil decision of construction cost betweenG-A), (G-B), (the civil decision of civil procedure betweenG-B), (the list of dividends on real estate auction), (C-A) the real estate transaction contract, (B) the copy of the register of apartment buildings at residence, and (the certified copy of the register of apartment buildings at residence);

arrow