Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 18, 2015, Defendant A appeared as a witness of the Ulsan District Court 503, the Ulsan District Court 503, the Ulsan District Court 503, which had been under the law of Ulsan District Court 55 on June 18, 2015, to take an oath, and the Plaintiff’s agent directly participated in the supply of and demand for materials, such as steel frame, board, etc., necessary for the construction of a new factory, and the Plaintiff’s agent directly participated in various construction works, such as site rearrangement, processing windows, etc., and D was asked to “the company that lent the name only because there was no comprehensive construction company that only lent the name as if the name was mentioned in the above, and there is no fact that the witness leased the name, and there is no fact that there was no material supply and demand.

“A false testimony was made.”

However, on April 2014, the Defendant prepared a contract for goods supply with approximately 138 tons of materials, such as steel, necessary for steel works, among the new construction works for the steel plant (ju) after early April 2014, the Defendant signed his/her signature and affixed his/her seal impression to the representative director column of the contract.

Accordingly, the defendant took an oath by law and made a false statement contrary to memory.

2. Defendant B is present at the same date, time, and place as above paragraph 1 and takes an oath, and he is asked by the Plaintiff’s agent that “A witness has been involved in the order for the construction of this case or the supply and demand of materials.”

“A false testimony was made.”

However, on April 2014, the Defendant drafted a contract for supply of goods under the above Paragraph 1 and signed his signature in the joint guarantor column and affixed his seal impression.

Accordingly, the defendant took an oath by law and made a false statement contrary to memory.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Recording notes, goods supply contracts, written judgments (2014 Gohap6400), recording records, and all certificates of registration;

1. The investigation report [the Defendants are guaranteed.]