Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 25,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on June 5, 2013, the Suwon District Court sentenced a one-year term of imprisonment to be a crime of fraud at the Suwon District Court, which was sentenced to a three-year term of suspension, and the said judgment was finalized on June 13, 2013.

Defendant

A is the representative of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B Co., Ltd. and is a person in charge of overall affairs, such as personnel, business, and fund management, and Defendant B Co., Ltd is a corporation established for the purpose of the wholesale business of electronic parts on January 13, 1995.

1. No defendant A shall submit to the Government a list of total tax invoices by seller and by seller without supplying or being supplied with any goods or services under the Value-Added Tax Act entered in falsity;

Around July 21, 2009, the Defendant filed a final tax return on the value-added tax for the first period of January 2009 with respect to Company B, which was located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu, 1 to 23. The Defendant did not supply the goods equivalent to KRW 41,00,000 to New Zealand Co., Ltd., and provided the goods equivalent to KRW 35,100,000 from D, although there was no supply of goods equivalent to the same amount. As the Defendant was supplied, the Defendant supplied the goods equivalent to the same amount of KRW 35,10,000 to the public officials in charge of the said tax office, including the supply of the total tax invoices and the total tax invoices by customer by entering them falsely, from April 25, 2008 to January 20, 201, submitted to the Government a false list of the total tax invoices by customer and by seller equivalent to KRW 636,706,400.

2. As set out in paragraph (1) above, Defendant B, the representative of Defendant B Co., Ltd., submitted to the Government a false list of the total tax invoices by customer and by seller as to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Written accusation (amended portion), the first to be made in January 2007 from 200 to 2010, the additional tax return (including each sale and the list of individual suppliers), the certified copy of the corporate register.