beta
Text
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.
Reasons
1. Facts charged;
A. Defendant A is the representative of “(State)B” located in the wife population D in Young-si, Defendant A.
No person shall issue or receive any tax invoice under the Value-Added Tax Act without supplying or being supplied with any goods or service, or submit to the Government a list of total tax invoices by seller or seller with false entries.
around July 25, 2011, the Defendant entered the list of total tax invoices by seller in falsity and submitted it to the Government as if he/she was supplied with goods or services equivalent to KRW 1,943,771,00,00 in the form of a unit of 1161-gil 71,00,000 among the wife population, and as if he/she was supplied with goods or services from the State, (E), (ju), F, and G, even though he/she was not supplied with goods or services, the Defendant submitted the list of total tax invoices by seller by seller by falsehood and submitted it to the Government. From the above date to January 25, 2013, even though he/she was not supplied with goods or services from each transaction as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list, even if he/she was not supplied with the value of supply, the sum of total tax invoices by seller was provided with goods or services equivalent to KRW 45,412,69
B. Defendant B, a representative of the Defendant, submitted to the Government a false list of total tax invoices, which entered falsely as if he was supplied goods equivalent to KRW 45,412,696,000, as stated in paragraph (1).
2. As the representative of Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”), Defendant A, as the representative of the Defendant Company E and F (hereinafter “Defendant B”), actually purchased goods, such as abandonment of the goods from the purchaser, such as Co., Ltd. and F (hereinafter “Co., Ltd. prior to the name of the corporation”), and the actual seller of the goods at the time did not know that he was another person, not the purchaser, and thus, Defendant A cannot be deemed to have submitted the list of total tax invoices by seller.