A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) intending to enter a bath with drinking alcohol on the victim D’s bath in Yeongdeungpo-gun C around 18:20 on February 6, 2016; and (b) the victim prevented the victim from taking the bath; (c) the victim scamed; (d) the equipment, such as hand scam on the knter, carried them into the knter, carried them into the knter; and (e) the victim scam and scam back with the stop scam which were next thereto.

“The Doctrine was expressed in a large sound.”

Defendant continued to call the victim’s answer that “I do not have to do so because I do not do so” from the injured party by demanding that I am “I am to do so,” and “I am to do so, I am to do so, and die.”

In order to change the room, it interfered with the victim's bath business in a way that booms the victim's breast part of his breast with his hand and booms the part of the victim's breast with his hand, such as booming the part of the victim's breast with his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's work by force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, and at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, the police officer F, who was called out after receiving a report on the instant case regarding the obstruction of duties, asked the Defendant for his personal information, and the said police officer stated that “I am, saw. Chewing fright, and immediately reported to the Defendant,” and assaulted the police officer to walk on the left side of the police officer’s left buckbucks.

Therefore, the police officer arrested the defendant in the act of interfering with the performance of official duties and let the defendant board the patrol vehicle, and moved to the E box located in Yeongdeungpo-gun G G, and the defendant again assaulted the police officer's face to the left side of the police station with the right edge after getting off the patrol vehicle.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties such as handling of 112 reported duties by police officers and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s legal statement.