The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, misunderstanding of facts, committed an indecent act by J.

B. The lower court’s sentence that is unfair in sentencing is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant is the chairperson of the D (mutual name before the modification: E) trade union.

(1) Around November 2013, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force by force by exposing the part of buckbucks in J (the age of 57) to the back of J, as he saw the part of suckbucks in the clerical room located in G in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Seoul, as he saw the part of the clerical room of the trade union (the age of 57).

(2) On December 2013, 2013, the Defendant was seated at D Trade Union Office located in Songpa-gu Seoul Songpa-gu Seoul and was on duty as a computer.

In the form of the J's walp x-cella program, the walp knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

B. The Defendant did not commit an indecent act against the J. The content of the Defendant’s lawsuit.

(c)

(1) The lower court’s judgment (1) on November 2013, 2013: (a) held that an indecent act by force was an indecent act by the lower court’s evidence; (b) although the J was under a condition that it might be recognized by the evidence of the lower court, i.e., it was difficult to believe that the J went out of the singing room only after the Defendant’s indecent act was committed against the Defendant, and it is difficult to believe that the N did not seem to have committed an indecent act by the Defendant; and (c) the J stated that the Defendant was unable to be deemed to have committed an indecent act by the Defendant; and (d) when there was a dispute, such as dismissal from the office of the labor union by the Defendant during the period of one year from the instant case and one year from March 2015, it was difficult to believe the Defendant’s statement as it is, and the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone, thereby recognizing this part of the facts charged.