logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.11.04 2015고단672
사기등
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than three months and by imprisonment for not more than six months with respect to the second crime in the judgment of the defendant.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On February 5, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months with prison labor for fraud in the Suwon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 24, 2014.

In addition, on December 23, 201, the defendant received a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Gyeyang Branch of the Suwon District Court on December 23, 201, and a fine of five million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the same court on December 19, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

"2015 Highest 672"

1. The Defendant engaged in the distribution brokerage business while operating the common interest in the common interest in the common interest of the building No. 402 in the common interest of the company.

The defendant, in mediating a local government-invested and a shipping company, had a local government-invested and a shipping company purchase a cargo vehicle with low market price in return for the purchase of a vehicle, had a local government-invested and a shipping company obtain a loan under the pretext of the purchase of a vehicle, and then had a local government-invested and a shipping company purchase some of the difference between the market price and the loan, which means that there is a transportation contract to the local government-invested and the actual transport of the cargo, and then let a local government-invested and a shipping company purchase a cargo vehicle with lower cargo than the market price, and then let a local government-invested and a shipping company purchase some of the difference between the market price and the actual purchase price.

On March 19, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F, “E” office located in Y, stating that “If the wing truck was purchased at KRW 80 million for the 201 year 201 wing-5 tons, the Defendant would enable G to enter into a contract for the carriage of shuttle and shuttle cargo, and would ensure the stable monthly sales of KRW 12 million.”

However, as the defendant did not actually have been entrusted with the transport contract of the above cargo, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to mediate the transport contract of the above cargo.

The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim, and let the victim take advantage of the amount of KRW 35 million at the market price, shall be KRW 80 million.

arrow