A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 13, 2014, at around 16:48, the Defendant was asked about whether he/she committed such an act from the police officer D(49 years old) who was a police officer of the Dobong Police Station C police box dispatched by the Defendant after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant was able to take the door door of 302, the lower floor, on hand, and was sent to the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, at around 16:48 on September 13, 2014.

Therefore, without any reason, the Defendant, without any reason, committed an act of alcohol, following the Defendant’s breath of “YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The sentence shall be determined as per the order, taking into consideration the following factors: (a) a criminal record having the same kind of reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) the degree of assault cannot be deemed severe; (c) a person committing the instant crime in contingency under the influence of alcohol; (d) a person who alone must support two children; and (e) a confession of the instant crime and reflect