1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a company that operates a freezing and freezing warehouse business, and the defendant is a person who has worked for the plaintiff company.

B. On July 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) retired from the Plaintiff Company; (b) prepared a “a confidentiality pledge” as specified below; (c) delivered it to the Plaintiff Company; and (d) received KRW 35 million from the Plaintiff Company on the same day.

I agree not to disclose or divulge to the third Chapter all the information pertaining to the company which they came to know at the Plaintiff Company while on duty after retirement and all the contents of the amount, process, contents, etc. of additional benefits through mutual agreement after retirement. If you violate this pledge, I swear that you will compensate for damages if you cause losses to you.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The defendant asserted that the plaintiff company did not divulge all information related to the plaintiff company, and the amount of money paid by the plaintiff company to the defendant to the third party, and agreed to compensate the plaintiff company for the damages caused by the violation, if any.

Nevertheless, the defendant violated the above agreement by stating to C the information related to the plaintiff company and the consultation related to overdue wages, which caused the plaintiff company to pay 26 million won to C in return for not divulging the information of the plaintiff company to C.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay 26 million won to the plaintiff company as damages as stipulated in the above agreement.

3. The fact that the Defendant, around July 6, 2018, retired from the Plaintiff Company, agreed not to divulge information about the Plaintiff Company, and the contents related to the payment of additional money, etc. to a third party is as seen earlier. According to the respective statements in the evidence Nos. 3 and 5, C on November 12, 2018, 26 million won as the retirement allowance difference and annual allowances, etc. from the Plaintiff Company.