The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.

1. On August 1, 2011, the Defendant entered the F&O company operated by E (hereinafter “Appellant”) and served as the chief of the business team upon the withdrawal of the complainant company from around June 13, 2013, and then served in G, a company of the same kind as the complainant company, from around August 2013, 201. The complainant is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling semiconductor equipment, and is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling semiconductor equipment, which manufactures and sells the precision-resistant control system that controls the temperature and dampness of equipment used in the HOO process in the semiconductor manufacturing process, and is a H&O and a major partner company related to semiconductor, a representative semiconductor-related company.

On the other hand, after joining the complainant company, the defendant prepared a security pledge to the effect that he will not leak trade secrets or important business assets of the complainant company to the outside as well as the company while in office, and prepared and submitted a resignation letter to the effect that the complainant company will not divulge business matters he/she acquired at the time of his/her retirement. In addition, when the complainant company retires, the complainant company has a duty to return or discard trade secrets or important business assets it acquired while in office.

Nevertheless, around June 13, 2013, the Defendant returned 86 files listed in the attached list of crimes, such as K drawings, which correspond to the trade secrets of the complainant company, to the complainant company at the office of the complainant (JJ building 1101) of Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sung-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant stored them in the outside equipment of the defendant, and carried them out without permission. A copy of the above data was stored in the Nowon-gu used by the complainant company G around August 2013.

As a result, the defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to the market exchange price of the above assets and suffered damages equivalent to the same amount from the complainant company.

2. The summary of the Defendant’s assertion is attached.