A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

From May 24, 2008 to May 24, 2010 to May 24, 2010, the Defendant is limited to “F” for convenience after “F” a stock company that manufactures and sells falsing machines.

A person who has worked as a director in the office of directors.

The Defendant, who served as the president of the “G Co., Ltd.” and the “Co., Ltd. H” representative director after the withdrawal from F, was suspected of using F’s trade secrets by using trade secrets, such as F’s mixed technology, such as manufacturing and selling “I” products of the same kind as F, and was investigated by the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office. At the same time, F filed a claim for damages against the Defendant for tort with the Seoul Central District Court, which was brought by F to the Seoul Central District Court for a civil trial.

On the other hand, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against F with the Seoul Eastern District Court on July 13, 201, and the F submitted a preparatory document to the court on January 5, 2012, the minutes of the board of directors signed by the Defendant as a supporting document. On the other hand, the Defendant argued that the minutes of the board of directors were forged, etc., and tried to file a false complaint against K of the F representative Director.

The Defendant, around February 8, 2012, at the public service center of the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor’s Office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central Public Prosecutor’s Office in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, submitted a complaint stating that “F (Representative K), for the purpose of exercise, the Defendant filed a complaint with the following: (a) the written consent of convening the board of directors, including the minutes of the board of directors, was omitted; (b) the minutes of the F Board of Directors’ meeting as of April 15, 2010; (c) the reduction of the procedures for convening the temporary shareholders’ meeting as of April 26, 2010; (d) the receipt of the notice of convening the temporary shareholders’ meeting as of April 19, 2010; and (e) the minutes of the temporary shareholders’ meeting as of April 26, 2010; and (e) the signature of the complainant was forged and exercised by his name.”

However, the defendant is directly a director or a shareholder of each of the above documents.