1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff, around 11:45 on May 15, 2014, felled in vavadi, while he was employed (1.50,00 won per day) in the construction site of the new construction works site of the business owner C located in Masung-si, and was engaged in vadi, thereby falling into vavadi, and was faced with an accident over 3 floors (or 3 floors and 2 floors).

Sheshe then submitted to the Defendant the first medical care benefits application for industrial accident compensation insurance by providing “the heading of the fluoral fluoral body, credit ples, fluor, fluor damage, fluoral damage, h1-3, pleathing (T9-12), ples fluorus fluorus fluoring (LT6-12, RT10-11), and cerebrovassis as the applicant’s disease.”

Secondly, on June 12, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to grant medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there is no apparent cerebrovascular opinion among the injury and disease in the application, on the following grounds:

Approved Injury Disease: Embrupt pelle of the right pelle, credit plesul, sule damage, sule damage, plesule (L1-3), plesule plesule (T9-12), plesule pelle (LT6-12, RT10-11) Non-approval Disease: LT6-12, RT11) pelum pelumum pelumumum pelumumumumum pelumumumum pelumum pelumumumum, and the Plaintiff filed a request for examination against the Defendant on August 18, 2014, but the request for reexamination was rejected on January 23, 2015.

(v) On the other hand, on September 24, 2014, the Defendant, upon the Plaintiff’s request, approved the “salvance, adaptation disorder, and other islands of detailed unknown situations,” as an additional injury, and on January 14, 2015, as an additional injury.

【Non-contentious facts, Gap’s evidence 3, Eul’s evidence 1-1, 2, Eul’s evidence 4, 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The key issue of the instant disposition is whether the instant disposition is lawful, and whether the Plaintiff suffered cerebral blood.

(1) The Plaintiff’s note (D University Hospital N&I) is from the cerebrovate Department which was executed at the time of internal origin from the 30 June 30, 2014 (Evidence A No. 4-3).