1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. In relation to a traffic accident that was on May 11, 2015, when the Plaintiff worked in Company B (hereinafter “instant accident”), the Plaintiff obtained medical care approval from the Defendant, with respect to the Defendant’s “the instant accident that was on the duty of attendance at the company,” and was under medical care for the Defendant’s injury (hereinafter “former approved injury”).

B. On September 24, 2016, when the Plaintiff was under medical care, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as brain cerebrion as a result of being treated as an emergency room of C Hospital immediately due to the symptoms of the left-hand paralysis.

C. On October 7, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for approval of the brain color that occurred during the medical care as an additional injury and disease. However, on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between brain flasing and the existing injury and disease, the Defendant rendered a disposition of approval of additional injury and disease (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1, 2, 3-1, 2-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion was in a state where medical treatment was required to prevent the occurrence of brain cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral her, which was limited to the use of the anti-cerebral cerebral her, and the risk of the occurrence of color was increased due

Therefore, the instant disposition issued on a different premise should be revoked as it is unlawful.

B. In light of the following facts and circumstances, it can be seen that the overall purport of the argument is visible as a result of the request for appraisal of the medical records to the head of the D Hospital of this court, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is brain fluence, the instant accident, or the injury or disease resulting from the previous approval of the Plaintiff.