logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.06.29 2017고정767
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On December 25, 2016, the Defendant driving the above taxi on December 25, 2016, which led to the driving direction of D in the direction of the sub-post office in Gwangju Seo-gu.

Since there is an intersection where traffic is controlled by the signal apparatus, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by proceeding in accordance with the direction of the signal apparatus to a person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected the electric signal, and neglected and proceeded as it is, and therefore, the Defendant was in the front part of the FK5 si driving in front of the Defendant’s driving of the FK5 si driving by violating the signal from the direction of the Songwon high school in the direction of Gwangju Station E (60 ).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, approximately two weeks of injury to the victim E, kneeed knee, etc., on each side of the victim G (hereinafter referred to as K5-si) who was accompanied by a kneeum fele, etc., requiring approximately 6 weeks of treatment, which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the same victim H (28 years of age), and on each side of the victim I (27 years of age) requiring approximately 2 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Each written statement of J, K, L, and I;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Photographss related to traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow