Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. The reasons why the court should explain this case in this case are as follows 2: the third fourth, the fifth, the fifth, the fifth, the fifth, of the judgment of the court of first instance.
The same “Determination on whether or not a claim for indemnity has occurred” shall be changed as described in the paragraph, and the same “Determination on whether a claim for indemnity has been incurred” shall be added to “the occurrence of the liability for damages,” and “Therefore, the Defendant shall be liable for damages caused by the instant fire in accordance with Article 758(1) of the Civil Act, shall be removed from the fifth to the fifth one, shall be removed, and the fifth to the fifth to the fifth to the “reduction of the amount of damages,” the fifth to the “Reduction of the amount of damages,” and the sixth to the first to the sixth to the second to the second to the second to the following.
With the exception of adding the entry in the port, it is the same as the entry in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.
2. Any alteration or addition;
A. The modified part
E. B was the entire building, excluding the floor floor concrete and the basic part, and was the damage from the entire machinery of the building. The specific amount of damage is KRW 93,594,175, and KRW 131,659,400, which deducts the value of the remainder from the total value of the used machinery that became unusable due to the destruction of the building in consideration of depreciation, and KRW 225,253,575.
F. On November 22, 2013, the Plaintiff paid KRW 93,594,175 with insurance proceeds of the building, and KRW 98,682,182 with insurance proceeds of the machinery (the amount obtained by deducting KRW 1,317,818 from the insurance amount of KRW 100,00,000 from the remaining value of the product owned by the Plaintiff) 192,276,357 with insurance proceeds of the building.
B. Additional parts
D. In a case where a third party, who is at the same time liable for damages arising from an illegal act or nonperformance, with respect to an insured event of non-life insurance in the legal doctrine on the occurrence and scope of the right to indemnity, files a claim for damages against him/her, the insured shall be subject to an