logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.06.21 2013고합179
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business;

A. On February 2, 2013, from around 19:30 to 20:30 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) caused the disturbance to the victim, i.e., the victim E (V. 5 years of age) operating the store, on the ground that he would avoid the Defendant’s telephone, and (b) caused the disturbance to the victim, such as “I am going to the end of this year, why I am going to the end of this year, why I am to the end of the fine. I am going to the end of this year; hereinafter the Defendant’s nameless customers who want to visit the store, thereby preventing him from using the store.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's operation of the above store by force.

B. On February 11, 2013, the Defendant from around 19:10 to 19:40 on the same day.

In the same place as the same as the paragraph, the victim E did not impose his fine, and the victim saw the victim "at the detention house due to four years", "I will lick the excreta on the shop. I will lick the excreta on the shop," and failed to take the name-free customers who want to visit the store, such as preventing them from using the store.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's operation of the above store by force.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Intimidation, etc.) and the defendant 1.

For the purpose of retaliationing victims E against the acts of this paragraph, at around 19:10 on February 11, 2013, the victim E reported to the police.

At the location of subsection (a) the victim had been living in the detention center for eight (8) days in the detention center. In this end, on February 2, 200, the victim threatened the victim by saying, “I would have died in blades unless the mother was living in the center.”

3. The defendant 1's obstruction of performance of official duties.

At the same time and place as in paragraph 112, the police box G of the beneficiary police station who was called out after being reported 112 intends to arrest the defendant as a flagrant offender, and the police box G.

arrow