Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Criminal facts
The Defendant was engaged in printing business with the trade name "C" in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, but the Defendant was proposed to forge a lease contract from D, E, etc. to offer 2-30,000 won per case, and was willing to forge a lease contract.
around October 2012, the Defendant entered the name: G, resident registration number: H into the name of G, and then affixed a G seal that had been inserted in advance to the name of G. after printing out the “name” into the “name” in the “Seoul Dongdaemun-gu F Building 103 Dong 601” and “security deposit” as “Seoul-gu F Building 103 Dong 601” and the “leased” column.
Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising authority, forged the apartment lease contract in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and obligations.
In addition, from July 2012 to June 2013, the Defendant forged 9 of the apartment charter contract (18 persons, the title of preparation) by the same method, such as the list of crimes in the attached list.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
2. Police seizure records;
3. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the investigative report (No. 5 and 9).
1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
2. Articles 40 and 50 of each Criminal Act for the concurrent crimes of awards ( mutually among the crimes of forging each private document with respect to a person who is prepared in the same document);
3. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment with labor;
4. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act.
5. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
6. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act include: (a) the means and method of the instant crime; (b) the content and number of forged documents; and (c) the use of forged documents for another crime; and (d) the risk of causing serious damage to the Defendant.
On the other hand, it is important to pay attention to the fact that the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case and against the mistake, and that the profit gained by the crime in this case has not been paid.