1. The amount of each real estate listed in the separate sheet after deducting the expenses for the auction from the proceeds of sale;

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the whole arguments as to the evidence Nos. 1 through 3, each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) shall be owned by the plaintiffs and the defendant in proportion to one-six co-ownership shares. There is no agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant as to the prohibition of partition of co-owned property, and the fact that consultation on the method of partition of co-owned property has not been

Therefore, the Plaintiffs may claim against the Defendants the division of the instant real estate jointly owned by the court.

(Article 268(1) and Article 269(1) of the Civil Act (Article 268(1) of the Civil Act). 2. The plaintiffs want to sell or divide the co-owned property, and the defendant himself/herself appeared at the date of the first pleading of this case and stated that he/she consented to auction or division. It is reasonable to divide the real property of this case into auction or by

3. In conclusion, it is decided as per Disposition by deciding to divide the remaining costs after deducting the costs of the instant real estate from the sale by auction according to the share ratio between the plaintiffs and the defendant.