1. The remaining money after deducting the expenses for auction from the proceeds of each real estate listed in the separate sheet sold to an auction;

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the whole pleadings as to the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including the land number), each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) as co-ownership of 1/2, the Defendants owned the share of 1/10, and the Defendants did not have an agreement prohibiting partition of co-owned property between the Plaintiff and the Defendants on the method of partition of co-owned property, and the agreement on the method of partition of co-owned property was not reached.

Therefore, the Plaintiff may file a claim with the court for the division of the instant real estate jointly owned by the Defendants.

(Article 268(1) and Article 269(1)2 of the Civil Act stated that the Plaintiff’s agent of the method of partition of co-owned property seeks auction division on the first date for pleading, and the remaining Defendants except Defendant B agree to auction division.

Therefore, it is reasonable to divide the real estate of this case into an auction and a method of distributing the price.

3. In conclusion, the Plaintiff and the Defendants decide to divide the remainder after deducting the costs of the instant real estate from the costs to be sold at auction according to their respective co-ownership shares, as set forth in the Disposition.