Person who requested disclosure or notification order;

Person who requested disclosure or notification order;

Cheongju District Court Order 2013Hu687 dated February 21, 2014

The appeal of this case is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

The disclosure and notification order of this case is unfair since the family members of the person who requested the disclosure and notification order, including the person who requested the disclosure and notification order, suffer from the suffering, and the damage caused by the order can not be recovered.

2. Determination

Whether a case constitutes “other cases where it is deemed that there are special circumstances that may not disclose personal information” provided for in an exception to an order to disclose or notify information ought to be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following factors: (a) the age, occupation, risk of recidivism, etc. of the person who requested the order to disclose or notify information; (b) the type, motive, process, consequence, and awareness of the crime; (c) characteristics of the crime, such as the crime; (d) the degree and anticipated side effects of the person who requested the order to disclose or notify information due to the disclosure or notification order; (e) the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the person who requested the order to disclose or notify information; (e) the prevention of sexual crimes subject to registration; and (e) the effect of protecting the victims of sexual crimes subject to registration (see

In full view of the aforementioned legal principles and various circumstances revealed in the record based on the nature, purport, etc. of the retroactive claim of this case, there is no special circumstance to retroactively disclose or notify personal information in the case of the person who requested disclosure or notification order.

Therefore, the court below's measure is just and acceptable, and there is no error as claimed by the claimant for the disclosure or notification order.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the appeal of this case is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Kim Jong-chul (Presiding Judge)