Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Around 13:00 on March 9, 2014, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim, on the grounds that the victim’s face was satisfyed and sated twice by hand on the ground that the victim was satisfyed, while the Defendant talked with the victim D (n, 28 years of age) and coffee at the C community service center office, and the victim seems satisfy.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Where a conviction on a sex offense subject to registration becomes final and conclusive in the judgment that constitutes a sex offense subject to registration, etc. under Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order, the accused is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and

In light of the Defendant’s age, occupation, risk of repeating a crime, motive, method and seriousness of the crime in this case, the degree and expected side effects of the Defendant’s entrance due to an order to disclose or notify personal information, the effect of preventing sexual crimes subject to registration that may be achieved therefrom, and the effect of protecting the victims thereof, etc., the Defendant shall not be ordered to disclose or notify personal information pursuant to Articles 47(1) and 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, the proviso to Article 49(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse.

The defendant's crime of this case with the reason of sentencing is not easy in light of the contents of the crime.