logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.08.22 2019고정75
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 15:00 on July 7, 2018, the Defendant was aware of the price interest at the street store operated by the Victim C (name, 56 years of age) located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant applied for changes in the indictment on May 3, 2019 by means of using the victim’s right shoulder from the victim’s right shoulder to his/her amb, etc. with his/her own hand, and the Defendant applied for changes in the indictment on May 3, 2019 was stated “The Defendant’s amb, etc. was described as the victim’s amb, etc., but it was determined that even if the Defendant’s amb, etc. was recognized without the changes in the indictment, it would impair the identity of the facts charged, or would not have any substantial disadvantage the Defendant’s right to defense, and ex officio recognition is made ex officio.

The victims were forced to commit indecent acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the respective legal statements of witnesses C and D to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the same Act concerning the crime, selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Where a conviction on a sex crime subject to registration becomes final and conclusive in the judgment, which is a sex offense subject to registration, under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and the defendant is obligated to submit personal information to a competent agency pursuant to Article

It is difficult to readily conclude that the Defendant exempted from disclosure and notification orders has no criminal record of committing a sex offense, and in light of the motive and background leading to committing the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, social relationship, etc., the risk of re-offending is likely to be established. The fact that the registration of personal information and the completion of sexual violence treatment programs alone appears to have the effect of re-offending, and other benefits and preventive effects expected from disclosure orders and notification orders, as well as the consequences therefrom.

arrow