Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defluence;

A. On January 27, 2016, at around 13:00 on January 27, 2016, the Defendant did not receive documents regarding the compensation cost and KRW 3.5 million for the dissolution and liquidation of the partnership on the 2 roadway on the ground that the victim F was not a member of the Defendant on the ground that 10 members E, etc. in the office of the D apartment building 403, Busan Northern-gu Seoul Northern Building, and that the Defendant was not in receipt of documents regarding the compensation cost and the amount of 3.5 million won for the dissolution and liquidation of the partnership. The Defendant put the victim into the ASEAN “Sari, Mawkk

“The head of Nara Association must:

The victim openly insultingd the victim by referring to the Domine, “Woo” as Domine.

B. In the same date, time, and place as mentioned in the above paragraph (a) above, Defendant G was able to see the victim G for the foregoing reasons, “I am flue flue rice with a flue flue flue flue, and I am flue with a flue flue tin.

In a large sense, “the victim was openly insultingd.”

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, obstructed the duties of the members receiving the documents from the members at the D Apartment Reconstruction Association Office by force by avoiding disturbance for a period of about one hour, including the fact that “F and G” is large enough to bring about a disturbance to F and G for the said reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the date of the sixth public trial shall be the date);

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. The police statements made to F and G, and the police statements made to E;

1. Complaint;

1. The investigation report (Attachment of image and voice materials at the time of interrogation) was actually attached to the investigation report in question, and this court’s examination of evidence was conducted by means of reproduction and viewing on January 27, 2016 and the CCTV screened images installed in a reconstruction association, “A” as of January 27, 2016, and “A” as of January 13:0 to 14:30” (as of the entry on each CD surface). The application of statutes is to the following.

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;