A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Unlike the actual terms and conditions of the real estate seller D, the Defendant, who has a debt equivalent to KRW 100 million, has forged a real estate sale contract, the down payment of which is unfashed, presented it to C, and purchased real estate on behalf of C in lieu of the unfashed down payment, with an intention to offset the existing debt to C by offsetting the amount of the unfash down payment.

1. On July 2013, the Defendant of a private document forgery at the trade name in the Gu-U.S. Si around 2013, the Defendant should terminate the seller’s establishment of a mortgage on 1.0 billion won in the form of a contract for real estate sale and purchase, including superficies on at least 5:0,000,000 won in the form of the contract for real estate sale and purchase, on the face of the location of the contract for real estate sale and purchase, using a tamplial pen, and on the face of the contract deposit.

2. The remaining due date shall be the transfer of ownership as soon as the building permit obtained; and

3. A seller shall provide a document to enable the buyer to obtain the authorization or permission.

4. The present arable products are the seller’s responsible and arranged to the seller’s order, and the seller’s order entered “FAPT 202-” and “G” and “H” in the resident registration column and telephone number column in the seller’s order column, and affixed a seal on D’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one chapter of a real estate transaction contract in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. On July 2013, the Defendant: (a) in the vicinity of the victim C’s residence located in Ulsandong-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) had concluded a contract for real estate purchase with the victim, such as Kimcheon-si, for the use of the forged real estate transaction agreement as if the contract was duly concluded with the victim, who was aware of such forgery; and (c) had concluded a real estate purchase agreement with the victim on behalf of the vehicle owner, such as Kimcheon-si, on behalf of the vehicle owner; (d) the total purchase price was KRW 390 million; and (e) the down payment was KRW 150 million.