The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

All the costs of the original judgment and the trial shall be borne by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal does not constitute a theft of the victim C’s Moccot as stated in the facts charged of this case.

2. The defendant asserted the same as the above reasons for appeal in the court below, and the court below rejected the defendant's assertion and its decision in detail under the title "the judgment on the principal claim". In full view of the circumstances as shown in the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, the defendant can sufficiently be recognized that he stolen the victim's Moccot as stated in the facts of crime in the court below's decision, and there is no error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts and thus, the above argument by the defendant is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the defendant's appeal is to be borne by the defendant pursuant to Articles 191 (1), 190 (1), and 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.