The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

All the costs of the original judgment and the trial shall be borne by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal: (a) the Defendant, who actually operates C around 2010, ordered H to give a contract for the business of selling clothes, etc. as an agent, and agreed to pay 10% of the sales amount generated from the event in return for the contract; (b) H employed E, etc. as the victimized workers to operate the above agency business; and (c) the Defendant did not have employed E, etc. as indicated in the facts charged.

2. In the judgment of the court below, the defendant asserted the same as the above reasons for appeal, and the court below rejected the above argument in detail with the defendant's argument and its decision under the title "as to the defendant's argument". In comparison with the above judgment of the court below, the judgment of the court below is justified and it is not erroneous in the misapprehension of facts in the judgment of the court below and there is no error of law affecting the conclusion of the judgment. Thus, the above argument

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit, and is dismissed in accordance with Article 191 (1), Article 190 (1) and the main sentence of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant bears the costs of lawsuit at the original

[However, Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act in the application of the laws and regulations in the holding of the court below are clear that the phrase “Article 70(1) and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014)” is a clerical error in Article 70 and Article 69(2) of the former Criminal Act. Thus, it shall be corrected ex officio pursuant