Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one million won.
Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be paid.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, “2018 Goi 92, 18, 2016, 18:50 on May 2, 2016 to 19:20 on May 2, 2016, in D D, operated by the victim C in the original city B from around 18:50 to 19:20 on May 2, 201, on the ground that the customer, who frand with coffee, e, e.g.
“Along with the desire of the employee F who works at that place, “I Hah L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
In addition, “I Hahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
"Accomponing the disturbance, such as the disturbance, caused customers who were in the multi-faceted room to leave, thereby obstructing the victim's multi-faceted business by force.
[2018 High 94] Defendant 1, on November 4, 2016, at the home of the victim I, who drinks with the victim on the part of the victim I, who is the Haju-si, Won-si on November 18:30, 2016. “The victim shall have to pay 40,000 won to the victim.”
“Although the victim did not borrow money, the victim saw himself/herself as a driver who drive away from his/her house, and thereby damaged the 40,000 won of the market price by shouldering the front door glass of the victim’s house.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to I, C, and J;
1. On-site photographs and photographs related to violence;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about criminal history;
1. Articles 366 and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;