The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment recognizes the defendant's mistake and reflects it, and that the defendant has no criminal history exceeding the same criminal history or fine, etc. are favorable circumstances.

However, the crime of this case is committed in the form of a special media record, such as the electronic records of public offices, by using the fact that children receive compensation and work as social service personnel at the administrative welfare center, was perused and issued a copy of the records by unlawful means, provided personal information to others. The nature of the crime is very poor, and the method of crime is interviewed with other persons. The personal information leaked by the defendant was used for land fraud; the personal information leaked to the defendant has a high possibility of criticism by inducing the defendant to commit the crime; the defendant was released from the Kakao Stockholm message; the defendant’s cell phone was discarded and discarded; the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable in full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments, such as the defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means, and result of the crime.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.