A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 2014, the Defendant met the victim by giving money to the victim as the name of sexual traffic and providing meals to the victim and having sexual intercourse with the victim from the time on which he became aware of the victim D (the age of 34) through a business trip closure.

1. On January 9, 2015, from around 23:00 to around 03:00 on January 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) had sexual intercourse with the victim “Felel E” in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu; and (b) found the victim’s mobile phone by taking advantage of the gaps in which the victim was diving; (c) discovered that there were the victim’s marriage pictures, etc. on the victim’s mobile phone; and (d) took photographs of the victim’s cell phone using the camera function inside the mobile phone on 30 occasions, the Defendant exceeded the panty, and taken the panty by taking advantage of the victim’s mobile phone function.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation or shame against his will.

2. Rape;

A. On January 10, 2015, the Defendant, at around 10:00, stored the victim’s body pictures, etc. at the Defendant’s home located in the Defendant’s home located in Ansan-si, Sinsan-si, the Defendant sent three copies of the victim’s body pictures to the Defendant by putting the Defendant’s phone to the Defendant, stating that “I do not have to go through a short-term, so I do not have to go.” However, the Defendant’s contact address was prevented without the Defendant’s phone call, and the victim’s cell phone was found to have been sent to the victim’s cell phone number, “D was deducted from the phone number in which I would have come to go to know whether I would have come to go to know.”

At around 14:00 on the same day, the defendant confirmed the above text messages, and showed that only a part of the body photographs of the victim taken by the victim was deleted by the victim as the defendant's house, and then considered the Kakakao Stockholm.