1. The punishment of the defendant shall be determined by six months;

2. Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

At around 11:00 on June 27, 2016, at the site of “C tunnel construction” located in Pyeongtaek-gun, Gangwon-do, in order to cause damage to the victim’s 230,000 won, and at the same time, the Defendant collected a frec V (1cm, 40cm in length) which is a dangerous object at the bar or its seat, and frecing the victim “hing off this frecing, dead,” and “hing off from the vehicle” means “hing off the vehicle,” and “hing off the vehicle, which is the victim’s seat, twice, so that the frec frec c c d f f d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d e d d e d d d e d d e d d d d e d d d h d d h d d h h h h h h h.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each investigation report (with regard to the field conditions, reasons for unrefusing iron bars, making an inquiry into the damaged vehicle, and attaching estimates for damage to the damaged vehicle);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Written estimate of damage;

1. Comprehensive shop taxes for vehicles (construction machinery);

1. Application of the statutes on site photographs, photographs of damaged vehicles, photographs of damaged vehicles, and photographs of damaged parts of the victim;

1. Inflicting the relevant legal assistance concerning the crime: Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act: Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the crime of this case is not good in light of the background, method, danger, etc.

The Defendant had been punished twice as violent crimes (the suspension of the execution of imprisonment in 2004, and the fine in 2009) but committed the instant crime.

This is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant.

The defendant makes a confession of all the crimes of this case.