1. Defendant E Hospital, F, and G jointly share 16,66,66,66 won, Plaintiff B, C, and D, respectively, and their respective levels.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties, Defendant E Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) is a medical corporation operating the hospital, and is the employer of the medical staff belonging to the Defendant Hospital, and the Plaintiff A is the spouse, Plaintiff B, C, and D of the deceased who died after being hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital (hereinafter “the deceased”). Defendant F, Defendant F, and G are the blood director and doctor belonging to the Defendant Hospital, and Defendant H are the emergency medical doctor belonging to the Defendant Hospital.

B. 1) The Deceased’s treatment process at the Defendant Hospital against the Deceased was conducted on July 1, 2017, where the Defendant Hospital complained of symptoms, such as chest, and applied to the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital. As a result of the heart examination on the Deceased, the Defendant Hospital’s medical team confirmed Non-influorial heart fluorcing symptoms, and on July 3, 2017, and July 5, 2017, the medical team of the Defendant Hospital performed the studcing influorcing surgery against the Deceased on two occasions (hereinafter “each studcing in the instant case”).

(2) On July 4, 2017, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed the blood transfusion to the deceased. As a result, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital diagnosed that there was a closed sculatory sculmatosis in the quantity of the deceased. As such, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital had to perform the blood transfusion to the deceased.

Accordingly, on July 9, 2017, after the addition of each content of this case, the deceased was tried before the blood crypary surgery for the blood crypary crypary crypary crypary cryprypary cryprypary crypryprypryprypryprypryprypryprypryprypryprypry

3) On July 15, 2017, the Deceased’s blood-oriented surgery (hereinafter “the instant blood-oriented surgery”) that was neither carried out by Defendant F from Defendant F on July 15, 2017.

(4) On the other hand, the Defendant Hospital’s medical personnel administered ices, which is an anti-divoral blood plate, to the Deceased from July 1, 2016 to July 14, 2016, and ceased to exist from July 15, 2016. From July 1, 2016 to July 8, 2016, the Defendant Hospital’s medical personnel administered typhin, a anti-divoral anti-divoral system, to the typhism from July 1, 2016 to the typhal system, while having been tried to go back to the blood-divosis.