logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.09.26 2017고단480
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 3, 2017, at around 06:10, the Defendant thought that the fire with the husband is due to D Apartment 102 Dong 501, which is the Defendant’s residence located in Chungcheongnam-si, and assaulted the above E and F, he received 112 report from the said F and received 112 report to the effect of domestic violence from the said E and expressed that he was able to be asked from G about the background of the instant case from G in the situation where he was dispatched to the said site, and that he was able to say that he was able to say that he was able to shot off this shot.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G, E, and F;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Injury and on-site photographs;

1. Each investigation report (to hear the victim F's telephone statement, to hear the victim E's telephone statement, and to examine whether to recognize the victim's injury to E) / [the defendant is a police officer dispatched on the day of the instant case who committed an act, such as a forced brupting of the defendant without notifying the defendant of the reason why the police officer was forced to walk the police officer in the course of responding to such act, but this is an resistance to illegal performance of official duties and does not constitute an obstruction of performance of official duties;

The argument is asserted.

However, according to the witness G and E's respective legal statements, the defendant assaulted E and F, a son, under the influence of alcohol, and reported by F, a police officer before the apartment to the police, and continued to stay in the house with the defendant. At the time, the defendant's house was at the time, due to the defendant's riot, so far as to make it impossible to enter the house out of the ridge, such as the fact that Kimchi Tong has been accumulated into the floor of the floor, and the police officers dispatched upon receipt of F's report.

arrow