Of the judgment of the court below of first instance, Defendant I, J, B, K and 2, and 3 shall be reversed in entirety.

Defendant

I shall be sentenced to imprisonment.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal and each sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendants (A. Defendant I: Imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years, confiscation, and confiscation;

B. Defendant J: 1 year of imprisonment, confiscation;

(c) Defendant B: (1) imprisonment for a maximum of 10 months, short of 6 months, confiscation, (2) imprisonment for a maximum of 10 months, short of 8 months, and (3) a maximum of 4 months and short of 2 months;

(d) Defendant K: (1) the maximum of ten months of imprisonment, the short of six months, the confiscation, and (2) the maximum of four months of imprisonment and the short of two months;

(e) Defendant A: imprisonment for a maximum of 10 months, short of 8 months;

F. Defendant C: Imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of 10 months and short of 8 months) is unfair (Defendant C filed an appeal only against the judgment of the court below of the second instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance did not file an appeal against the judgment of the court of first instance. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the judgment of the court of first instance on the part of Defendant C was separated and finalized as both parties did not appeal.

A. Prior to the judgment of the court below on the grounds for appeal by Defendants B and K ex officio, the judgment of the court below against Defendants B and B, and the judgment of the court below against Defendant B, the judgment of the court below against Defendants B and C, and the judgment of the court below against the above Defendants C and the judgment of the court below against the Defendants 1 and 3 filed an appeal against them, and this court decided to hold concurrent hearings against each of the above appeal cases. Each of the offenses in the judgment of the court below against Defendants B and K is a concurrent offense under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and shall be sentenced to one punishment pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act. In this respect, since the judgment of the court below against Defendants B and K is a concurrent offense under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, the parts of the

B. We examine the judgment of Defendant I and J on the unfair argument of sentencing. The instant crime was committed by Defendant I and J as the liability for withdrawal of the Washington fraud group for a considerable period of time, and the Defendant I and J received and kept the access media (cash card) to be used for the crime of Bosing fraud. In light of the social harm, etc. of the crime of Bosing, the relevant crime was considerably significant, and Defendant I directly contact with the company of Bosing fraud group.