A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 10, 2015, the Defendant, at around July 10, 2015, committed fraud, at an office located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, the victim C, and the victim C, “it has a golf course in Chungcheongnamsan, and is placed with an appraisal and assessment and seeking to borrow a golf course as security. However, there is insufficient cost to find an appraisal and assessment report.

Along with a loan of KRW 10 million, a false statement was made that “I will receive a loan by finding an appraisal statement and pay the loan.”

However, the Defendant had personal intent to lend money from the damaged party, such as repayment of debt, and even if the Defendant did not own a golf course and borrowed money from the damaged party, it did not have any intent or ability to receive a loan as collateral and repay it.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired the amount of KRW 10 million from the victim to the account of the National Bank (D) in the name of the defendant on the same day.

2. On July 16, 2015, the Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1 above around July 16, 2015, attempted to invest KRW 10 billion in business funds from E, a foreign investment financial company, to the victim.

It is same to make it easy to get an investment to prepare a large-scale office. Accordingly, the office transferred the office with the loan of KRW 50,000,000 as necessary expenses (guarantee). The office transferred the office and borrowed money immediately after receiving an investment of KRW 10,000,000 from E.

However, in fact, the Defendant intended to lend money from the injured party to pay the Defendant’s employee’s pay, etc., and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have any intent or ability to receive 10 billion won from E to repay the said money.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 50 million won from the victim to the company bank (F) account in the name of the defendant on the same day.

3. On January 2015