1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant intentionally commits a traffic accident or after having undergone a traffic accident, and is hospitalized at a hospital, in order to acquire insurance money by deceiving an insurance company.

On November 22, 2012, at around 16:58, the Defendant discovered that the automobile of sod, which is driven by E in the vicinity of the D High School located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, driven by E, and had been driven by the off-to-land in some parts of the side, and the front wheel part of the vehicle of Obababababa was faced with the front gate part of the above Abababababababa, and was written back by the Furbabababa, and was hospitalized in the front gate part of the said Ababababababa, and was delivered KRW 1,908,870 from LIG damage insurance, the victim was hospitalized for five days as the accident occurred.

In addition, from September 4, 2008 to December 20, 2012, the Defendant received a total of KRW 16,378,190 from the victim insurance companies in the above manner as described in the attached list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually obtained another's property by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each police protocol on G, H, I, J, K, E, L, and M;

1. N’s statement;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crimes are repeated several times in a planned and organized manner in the judgment;

1. Articles 351 and 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment as ordered under Article 51 of the Criminal Act shall be determined by taking into account the maximum of the conditions of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that the accused of the two types of punishment under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is divided into several parts, and that the victim