logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.09.04 2015고정1472
재물손괴
Text

1. The defendant is innocent; 2. The summary of the judgment of innocence shall be published against the defendant.

Reasons

1. At around 12:00 on January 1, 2015, the Defendant operated a collection of charges, and filed a civil petition with a victim on the following issues: (a) on January 1, 2015, on the ground that there was a dispute between the victim and the victim, at around 3.5 million won including personnel expenses, equipment, removal expenses, etc., which are landscaped trees laid down in front of the building site owned by the victim in Seo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Busan, for the reason that a variety of landscaped trees, such as 1.0%, 1.0%, 1.0%, 20%, 3m of trees, 3m1%, and 3m of trees, are obstructed by the passage of the passage to nearby Epark, after the Defendant’s collection of the frequency, the Defendant used the landscaping zone without the victim’s consent.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant is operating a house and house in Busan, Seo-gu (hereinafter “the land in this case”), and the victim was the owner of the land in Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, which is adjacent to the land in this case and led to a dispute, such as filing a civil lawsuit, such as securing the passage of the defendant and the defendant from this case to the owner of the land in Busan, Seo-gu. The land in this case has a passage road (hereinafter “the passage of this case”). The passage of this case is located within the boundary of the land in this case and the passage of this case was at issue in dispute over securing the passage between the previous defendant and the victim. The passage of this case was the passage of the road in this case, like the passage of this case. The victim recently occupied the neighboring site and installed the retaining wall without permission while constructing a building on the land owned by the victim, and the defendant filed a civil petition with the Gu office to restore the victim to its original state, and the victim ordered the restoration to its original state.

arrow