logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.01.05 2016고단674
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant shall pay 76,106,200 won to the applicant for compensation. The above compensation order shall be issued.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around September 17, 2015, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 674, the Defendant, at the E office located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Seoul, would lend money in need of supply to the Victim F within two months.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was thought to use the money as other debt repayment and gambling with the money borrowed from the injured party, and around that time, the financial institution was obligated to pay KRW 100 million, making it difficult for the Defendant’s income to pay monthly interest. Therefore, even if he borrowed money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to pay such money.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1 million on the same day from the victim, KRW 2 million on September 30, 2015, KRW 5 million on December 30, 2015, and KRW 5 million on December 30, 2015 from around that time to February 22, 2016, and received a total of KRW 259,950,000 from the total of 7 victims, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, on a total of 28 occasions, as indicated in the list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was delivered property by deceiving the victims.

On December 28, 2015, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 823, the Defendant, at the office of Cheongju-si, Co., Ltd., Ltd., in which the Defendant works for the Defendant in the petition-gu, Cheongju-si, Cheong-si, called a telephone to the Victim C, and then gains profits from purchasing the hard disks produced from E in the name of the third business operator and selling it to other businesses. Therefore, if he/she lends money, 10% interest shall be added to the principal within the day.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, the Defendant was thought to use the money borrowed from the injured party to repay other debts and to purchase sports discussions, etc. Around that time, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the debt even if the Defendant borrowed the money from the injured party with the debt of 150 million won in return for the repayment of other debts.

The defendant.

arrow